School Choice Success
by Robert Enlow
A landmark new study finds that school choice programs throughout the
country generated nearly $444 million in net savings to state and local
budgets from 1990 to 2006. Contrary to opponents' predictions, the
analysis also finds that instructional spending per student has
consistently gone up in all affected public school districts and states.
School choice saves. It saves children, and now we have empirical
evidence that it saves money.
Released by our Friedman Foundation, "Education by the Numbers: The
Fiscal Effect of School Choice Programs, 1990-2006" provides the first
comprehensive analysis of how the nation's school choice programs have
affected state and public school districts. Of the 12 voucher and
tax-credit scholarship programs that began operations before 2006, every
program is at least fiscally neutral, and most produce substantial
savings. Seven more programs have been created since 2006.
"Programs giving parents freedom to choose in their child's education
are growing rapidly in number and size," said Dr. Susan Aud, author of
the study and a Friedman Foundation senior fellow. "And a program's
fiscal impact has become an important political issue. This brings
empirical evidence to that debate."
For years, opponents have claimed that school choice reduces spending in
public schools. Yet the study's analysis of the states and school
districts where school choice is available finds that this is not the
case. Instructional spending in areas affected by school choice has
uniformly increased.
In the face of this evidence, opponents of educational freedom will find
it tougher to bend the truth. Our research adheres to the highest
standards of scientific rigor. We've seen seven school choice programs
start in just the last year because evidence of the benefits are growing
just as rapidly.
Robert Enlow is executive director and COO of the Milton and Rose D.
Friedman Foundation.
The study can be downloaded here. The Friedman Foundation has provided analysis to many states
on the fiscal effect of proposed school choice measures. Consistently,
the studies - for states like Arizona, New Hampshire, Utah, Virginia,
Minnesota and Kentucky - point to substantial savings.
|