| Kissy-Face on Obama
by Vincent Fiore
You would almost have to be comatose not to have noticed
the oohs and aahs regarding the freshman senator from Illinois, Barack
Obama.
Ever since his "coming-out party" in 2004 as the keynote speaker at the
Democratic National Convention in Boston, Massachusetts, Obama has
garnered much fawning praise, and is now considered as a contender for
the White House in 2008.
Pardon me for sounding decidedly contrarian when speaking of Obama's
presidential aspects, but I would sooner believe that Howard Dean had
become the Archbishop of Canterbury.
But what of Mr. Obama himself? Do you think he believes it? Well, he
might upon seeing his name so celebrated after barely being sworn in on
January 4, 2005. On April 18, 2005, Time Magazine designated Obama as
one of "The World's Most Influential People," citing Obama as a "Leader
and Revolutionary."
On October 17, 2005, writer Andrew Stephen of the influential British
journal, New Statesman, lists Obama as one of "10 people who could
change the world."
Time Magazine strikes yet again, with liberal soothsayer Joe Klein
penning the October 23, 2006, cover story that reads: "Why Barack Obama
could be our next President."
Further accolades include honorary doctorates from no less than four
major universities, like Northwestern and Xavier. Why, there is even
talk of canonization within the holy halls of the Vatican for Saint
Obama.
And all this for a man who has barely reached the two-year mark in the
Senate.
But on a serious note, the public knows much about Barack Obama. Well,
let me rephrase that. The public knows about as much about Obama as the
mainstream media allows. And what is allowed is as follows:
Barrack Obama is young. He is energetic. He is oh-so-comfortably and
confidently religious. He is "above" the usual party labels like
"liberal" and "conservative." He is handsome. And, he is black.
Now, it seems I heard a lot of these superlatives applied to another
recent contender for the White House in 2008. With the exception of
being black, former Senator John Edwards was feted with much the same.
Mr. Edwards is back, and this time he brings his "two America's"
campaign without the baggage of 2004 Democratic presidential nominee
John Kerry, who inspired no one in 2004, and matters even less today.
Edwards has learned a lesson, and maybe he will learn a few more in time
for 2008. But more on that in a moment.
For all his media-trumpeted attributes, Barack Obama is a Senate "back
bencher" who has done virtually nothing in the scant two years that he
has been there. Aside from becoming the media's present-day darling and
poster boy for perceived political even-handedness, Obama has--so
far--had an unspectacular career.
We have seen the media play kissy-face time and again--even to
Republicans. Arizona senator and 2008 presidential wannabe John McCain
was touted as a great "moderate and farseeing voice of reason," but that
was yesterday. Obama is today.
So why all this attention given to Obama? My guess has always been that
he is a work in progress, and that work is the media's making of a
vice-president. Maybe this is obvious to some, but far too many see
Obama as presidential material, and brother, he just can't fill those
shoes as of yet.
It is preposterous to think that a man of no experience in a chamber
consisting of 100 Senate-sized egos can snatch the presidency of the
United States, overzealous media aside. Rather, put Obama with someone
who has the money, organization, and seasoning to be a presidential
contender.
Surely, everyone knows that I am talking about Hillary Clinton. Or am I?
Hillary has all of the above in plenty, but also has something else
aplenty, and that is considerable negatives. While Hillary may attract
the hard left vote (which she will get), Democratic Party legacy voters,
and a sizable contingency of women voters, she will not make it without
someone like Obama to dull her shrillness, and the polarization that a
Hillary Clinton candidacy has inspired around the country.
Obama can mitigate this, and bring the minority vote home in a big way,
as minorities will only see a minority, and not an unqualified
candidate. Obama will attract new voters to offset what is sure to be a
surge of other new voters simply out to vote against Hillary.
This puts two-year Senator Barack Obama in a powerful position, possibly
much more so than Hillary desires.
Without Obama, or someone so hubristically celebrated as he, Hillary
Clinton may never get out of the primaries. If Hillary feels the
pressure, and sees her poll numbers mired in the upper-thirties to
low-forties, it will be "vice presidential" running mate Barack Obama.
This can happen very easily, unless...
Unless that other once-upon-a-time media darling, John Edwards, is bold
enough--or desperate enough--to take a risk here and take Obama and run
with him.
The media will not be able to resist the temptation and desire to crown
such a political duo as America's "New Politicians." Young, handsome,
cutting-edged informed, and of course, non-partisan.
The media hyperventilating will be of epic proportions. It would be as
if George Clooney and Leonardo Dicaprio had come to inhabit 1600
Pennsylvania Avenue--intellectually gifted, of course. It might even be
described as close to nirvana as America can get!
Well, it would be something like that.
Is Barack Obama presidential material? No. Will he declare as a
candidate for 2008? No. Is he being thought of as a vital key for 2008,
and the Democrats "triumphant and long-overdo" return to power in the
White House? Indeed.
Obama may be an empty political suit to all who really take a moment to
actually look at what he's done, but he fits the bill quite nicely in
this, the latest round of mainstream media kingmaking, or more
personally put, the ornament that adorns the arm of Hillary Clinton, or
John Edwards.
Vincent Fiore is a freelance political writer who lives in New York
City. His work can be seen throughout the Internet, including the
American Conservative Union Foundation, GOPUSA, Human Events, and
theconservativevoice. Vincent is a staff writer for the New Media
Alliance and a contributing writer for NewsBusters.org.
|