The Real Budget Numbers
By Brian Riedl

1) Yes, CBO projects a balanced budget by 2012. However, CBO projections assume:

  • Expiration of all Bush tax cuts, as well as other temporary tax cuts;
  • The AMT is not fixed;
  • No more appropriations for Iraq, Afghanistan, or Katrina-related reconstruction;
  • No reconciliation spending reforms; and
  • That inflation-adjusted discretionary spending will be frozen.

We fix these assumptions by assuming:

  • CBO numbers for extending the tax cuts and fixing the AMT.
  • CBO numbers on an Iraq/Afghanistan gradual phase-down.
  • CBO numbers for past Katrina spending, as well as our own modest estimates for future appropriations.
  • CBO numbers for the reconciliation.
  • Defense discretionary outlays (excluding supplemental bills) rising 5% annually.
  • Non-defense discretionary outlays (excluding supplemental bills) rising 2% in 2006 and 4% thereafter.

2) Fixing these assumptions leads to budget deficits of:

  • $394 billion in 2006
  • $412 billion in 2007
  • $428 billion in 2008
  • $436 billion in 2009
  • $458 billion in 2010,
  • (Skipping a few years) $805 billion in 2015. At that point it would it take a $6,500 per-household tax increase just to balance the budget.

 

 

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Spending

 

2472

2694

2808

2947

3073

3219

3395

3533

3751

3972

4211

4484

Revenues

 

2154

2300

2396

2519

2637

2761

2884

3040

3184

3339

3505

3679

Surplus/Deficit

 

-318

-394

-412

-428

-436

-458

-511

-493

-567

-633

-706

-805

3) Tax revenues are not the problem:

  • Between 2004 and 2006 revenues are projected to rise by an unprecedented $420 billion.
  • This 22% revenue jump is the largest 2-year revenue surge since 1976-1978, when high inflation and bracket creep were steeply raising revenues.
  • This will bring revenues near the post-war average of just under 18% GDP.

4) Such surging tax revenues cannot keep up with runaway spending, which:

  • Surged 8% in 2005, the second-highest growth since 1985.
  • Spending will leap 9% in 2006.
  • Overall, spending from 2004-2006 will leap $402 billion.
  • From 2005-2016, revenues will increase 5% annually, but spending is projected to jump 6% annually.

(These are after correcting the CBO baseline as described above)

5 ) Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are out of control:

  • In 2005 these 3 programs spent $1,034 billion (8.4% GDP). In 2016 they will spend $2,260 billion (10.8% GDP)
  • Medicare will increase by $112 billion (34%) from 2005 through 2007 as the drug benefit begins.
  • Over the next decade, Medicare will grow 9% annually, Medicaid 8% annually, and Social Security by 6% annually.
  • 2006 will be the first year when Medicare/Medicaid ($582 billion combined) outspend Social Security ($550 billion).

6) Regarding the President’s pledge to halve the deficit by 2009:

  • This promise was made when the 2004 projected deficit was $521 billion (4.5% GDP).
  • The President pledged a 2009 deficit of 2.25% GDP.
  • Note that the actual 2004 budget deficit ended up much lower than that projected figure.
  • The President’s pledge currently translates into a 2009 deficit of $343 billion.
  • Our 2009 projections show a budget deficit of $436 billion - $93 billion above the target.
  • Either way, the 2009 deficit is not the issue. Long-term spending trends from Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid should be the focus.

Brian Riedl is the Grover M. Hermann Fellow for Federal Budgetary Affairs at The Heritage Foundation.


Email the Editor

© 2005 American Conservative Union Foundation 1007 Cameron Street, Alexandria, VA 22314 Tel: 703.836.8602