Unmasking Political Correctness
by William S. Lind
In this edition, Paul Weyrich refers to "cultural Marxism." He asked me, as
Free Congress Foundation's resident historian, to write this column
explaining what cultural Marxism is and where it came from. In order to
understand what something is and what to do about it, you have to know its
history.
Cultural Marxism is a branch of western Marxism, different from the
Marxism-Leninism of the old Soviet Union. It is commonly known as "multiculturalism" or, less formally, Political Correctness. From its
beginning, the promoters of cultural Marxism have known they could be more
effective if they concealed the Marxist nature of their work, hence the use
of terms such as "multiculturalism."
Cultural Marxism began not in the 1960s but in 1919, immediately after World
War I. Marxist theory had predicted that in the event of a big European war,
the working class all over Europe would rise up to overthrow capitalism and
create communism. But when war came in 1914, that did not happen. When it
finally did happen in Russia in 1917, workers in other European countries
did not support it. What had gone wrong?
Independently, two Marxist theorists, Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg
Lukacs in Hungary, came to the same answer: Western culture and the
Christian religion had so blinded the working class to its true, Marxist
class interest that Communism was impossible in the West until both could be
destroyed. In 1919, Lukacs asked, "Who will save us from Western
civilization?" That same year, when he became Deputy Commissar for Culture
in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun government in Hungary, one of Lukacs's
first acts was to introduce sex education into Hungary's public schools. He
knew that if he could destroy the West's traditional sexual morals, he would
have taken a giant step toward destroying Western culture itself.
In 1923, inspired in part by Lukacs, a group of German Marxists established
a think tank at Frankfurt University in Germany called the Institute for
Social Research. This institute, soon known simply as the Frankfurt School,
would become the creator of cultural Marxism.
To translate Marxism from economic into cultural terms, the members of the
Frankfurt School - - Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Wilhelm Reich, Eric
Fromm and Herbert Marcuse, to name the most important - - had to contradict
Marx on several points. They argued that culture was not just part of what
Marx had called society's "superstructure," but an independent and very
important variable. They also said that the working class would not lead a
Marxist revolution, because it was becoming part of the middle class, the
hated bourgeoisie.
Who would? In the 1950s, Marcuse answered the question: a coalition of
blacks, students, feminist women and homosexuals.
Fatefully for America, when Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, the
Frankfurt School fled - - and reestablished itself in New York City. There,
it shifted its focus from destroying traditional Western culture in Germany
to destroying it in the United States. To do so, it invented "Critical
Theory." What is the theory? To criticize every traditional institution,
starting with the family, brutally and unremittingly, in order to bring them
down. It wrote a series of "studies in prejudice," which said that anyone
who believes in traditional Western culture is prejudiced, a "racist" or
"sexist" of "fascist" - - and is also mentally ill.
Most importantly, the Frankfurt School crossed Marx with Freud, taking from
psychology the technique of psychological conditioning. Today, when the
cultural Marxists want to do something like "normalize" homosexuality, they
do not argue the point philosophically. They just beam television show after
television show into every American home where the only normal-seeming white
male is a homosexual (the Frankfurt School's key people spent the war years
in Hollywood).
After World War II ended, most members of the Frankfurt School went back to
Germany. But Herbert Marcuse stayed in America. He took the highly abstract
works of other Frankfurt School members and repackaged them in ways college
students could read and understand. In his book "Eros and Civilization," he
argued that by freeing sex from any restraints, we could elevate the
pleasure principle over the reality principle and create a society with no
work, only play (Marcuse coined the phrase, "Make love, not war"). Marcuse
also argued for what he called "liberating tolerance," which he defined as
tolerance for all ideas coming from the Left and intolerance for any ideas
coming from the Right. In the 1960s, Marcuse became the chief "guru" of the
New Left, and he injected the cultural Marxism of the Frankfurt School into
the baby boom generation, to the point where it is now America's state
ideology.
The future goal of conservatism must include unmasking multiculturalism and
political correctness and tell the American people what they really are:
cultural Marxism. Its goal remains what Lukacs and Gramsci set in 1919:
destroying Western culture and the Christian religion. It has already made
vast strides toward that goal. But if the average American found out that
political correctness is a form of Marxism, different from the Marxism of
the Soviet Union but Marxism nonetheless, it would be in trouble. The next
conservatism needs to reveal the man behind the curtain - - old Karl Marx
himself.
William S. Lind is Director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism of the
Free Congress Foundation. The Free Congress Foundation's website,
www.freecongress.org, includes a short book on the history and nature of
cultural Marxism, edited by William S. Lind. It is formatted so you can
print it out as a book and share it with your family and friends.
Email
the Editor
|