| Winners
and Losers of Election 2004
by Vincent Fiore
The
election of 2004 has finally, and mercifully, come to a close. So
what do millions of voters, the most ever for a presidential election,
(though not in overall percentage) do now that the frantic pace
of the campaigns are behind them? The winners will celebrate for
a few days, and the losers will engage in some soul-searching and
despondency.
After
these first few days of the highest highs and the lowest lows--and
from what I have seen and read, this is not an overstatement--Americans
will slip back into the comfy confines of their lives. It has been
a long and torturous campaign.
But
besides President Bush being Tuesday's big winner, there were an
abundance of other winners--and losers as well. Here are a few that
will stand out as we look back at the Election of 2004.
Winner:
The American voter. Nearly 117 million voters flocked to
the polls on Tuesday, a record number. Voters braved lines that
were at times eight hours long. In many parts of the country that
day, bad weather was thought to be a factor in keeping turnout low.
Yet neither rain, sleet, nor threat of long lines into the night
kept the voters away from their appointed polling precincts.
Loser:
New York and New Jersey. To be completely honest, I did not really
expect much to change in the voting preferences of these two bastions
of liberalism. Still, I am disappointed. President Bush proved himself
true to his word after 9/11 by giving New York some 20 billion dollars
of aid. Couple this with the Republican National Convention this
year and it becomes clear that this president felt a profound need
to see the Big Apple shine once more. At least New Jersey gave the
pretense of going for Bush on election night, but the state's liberal
leanings are, if anything, more firmly rooted than ever, regardless
of the 700-plus souls the Garden State lost to terror on the west
side of Manhattan on 9/11.
Winner:
Election night political commentators. Fox News' Bill Kristol was
one of the first to observe just how woefully inaccurate the now
infamous exit polling was. Couple this with the incredibly precise
precinct data from Michael Barone, who seemed to know just how many
voters each party would claim, and you had nothing short of a stellar
performance. CNN's James Carville receives high praise for his heart-felt
and honest admission that President Bush has "a superior hand
in this election right now." Though CNN regulars Zahn, Begala,
and Woodruff relayed to the viewer otherwise, Carville nailed what
ails the Democratic Party today: the absence of the rural voter.
Loser:
Election night political commentators. If you tuned to MSNBC around
11:00 pm, you saw political pundit Chris Matthews wishing he was
within reach of a sharp object. Once the networks called Florida
for Bush, Matthews looked for all the world like a very distraught
Kerry supporter. Up until that point, Matthews was semi- declarative
and jovial in his support of a Kerry administration, and unashamedly
gleeful when discussing early exit polling. Perhaps the strangest
performance of the night goes to Fox News politico Susan Estrich.
Looking glassy-eyed and at times acquiring a southern accent, Estrich
boasted of having first-hand knowledge of Florida and Ohio, claiming
they would both go for Kerry. Did Miss Estrich start celebrating
a bit too soon in the day after viewing those fictitious exit polls?
One hopes that Fox had the sense to designate a driver for her after
a long and disappointing night.
Winner:
John Kerry. Showing the grace and class that was so absent
during his campaign, Kerry took a good look at the election results,
and conceded. "I offered him [Bush] and Laura our congratulations
on their victory. We had a good conversation, and we talked about
the danger of division in our country and the need -- the desperate
need for unity, for finding the common ground, coming together.
Today I hope that we can begin the healing." But Kerry went
even further: "The outcome should be decided by voters, not
a protracted legal process." Kerry's words remind us that sometimes,
the best things said in a campaign are said after it is over.
Loser:
John Edwards. John Edwards is finished as a presidential contender.
Choosing Edwards as his vice presidential running-mate was Kerry's
biggest blunder of the campaign. Edwards proved to be just "a
good head of hair." Lacking in policy and breadth, his "two
Americas" mantra fell short after the primaries. After his
debate against Dick Cheney, Edwards engaged in the politics of stealth—rarely
seen and even less heard. His "concession" speech was
a prelude to 2008, but it is already over for him before it's begun.
Winner:
The Internet. When the first batch of exit polls came out about
1:30 pm, EST, it took about five minutes for bloggers and web masters
to spread the word. George W. Bush may owe part of his victory to
this part of the new media, as spaces like this one and others quickly
debunked the polling data much the same way that Dan Rather and
"memogate" was exposed. Kudos to the pajama-wearing blogger
brigades.
Loser:
The old Media. Those sounds you hear are the last gasping breaths
of the New York Times and CBS News. Staunchly opposed to Bush throughout
his first term, the prospect of a second four years in office exposed
the deep-seated bias among the old media and forever revealed themselves
to the public at large. The question, "is there a liberal bias
in the main stream media?" has been fully addressed by the
very actions of the media themselves during this campaign.
Other
Winners: Hillary Clinton, who can start her run for 2008.
Rasmussen polling, who came closest to the actual numbers in the
end. Realclearpolitics.com, which became "The" polling
source for nearly every political pundit and junkie alike. The Republican
Party, which increased its numbers within the Senate and the House,
and along with President Bush, lay claim to the mandate that eluded
them the first four years.
Other
Losers: The "youth" vote decided to sleep in
on Election Day, with only a disappointing 17% showing up at the
polls. Hollywood and entertainment types like Michael Moore and
Bruce Springsteen, who probably aided Bush in his reelection bid
by simply being something their not: Politically in touch with the
people.
Exit
polling and pollster John Zogby were both seriously off on Election
Day. In Zogby's case, it became near-impossible for him to predict
an informed opinion, as in May, 2004, he predicted that the race
was "Kerry's to lose." On Election Day, Zogby conveniently
posted a prediction of a 311-259 electoral vote tally for Kerry;
right after the first batch of suspect exit polling came out. All
in all, it was a hapless display of wishful thinking through the
madness of polls.
The
Democratic Party, which has lost power for a generation, was Tuesday's
biggest loser. Leaderless and apparently clueless as to what the
majority of America thinks, Democrats will have to huddle together
and re-invent their party, which may mean finding religion in a
hurry.
Finally,
I was a loser on this day. I predicted chaos would run rampart during
the voting process, and after. While there will be a few isolated
incidents in the days to come, it seems that America has steered
clear of electoral Armageddon. My apologies to all, as I lacked
the ability to see past the debacle of 2000.
All
in all, 2004 comes to an exciting close as one of the most politically
charged seasons on record. And just think, we get to do it all over
again in 2006.
Vincent
Fiore is a freelance political writer who lives in New York City.
Email
the Editor
|