| Reader
Comments
Editor:
Your whole ConservativeBattleline.com and ACU Foundation site looks
great, and I've received a number of positive comments. Best wishes.
Quin
Editor:
Has the Vice President--who we thought was the strongest conservative
voice in the administration--broken with George W. Bush and the
Republican Party on a fundamental moral foundation of Western morality?
Or is Dick Cheney's amazing statement at a town meeting in Davenport,
Iowa that "people ought to be free to enter into any kind of
a relationship they want to" a carefully-orchestrated feint
to GOP "moderates" and independents, designed to present
a "kinder, gentler" face of the administration to the
electorate? Guess what, it does not matter which explanation is
correct. This is just one more piece of evidence--to be added to
the multi-trillion dollar deficit, the new $400 billion prescription
drug entitlement, and the infuriating and incompetent exercise in
"nation-building"--that there is no real conservative
in the 2004 presidential race. The editor’s Battleline essay,
"What Can Bush Do?" is dead on target--could not be improved.
Sid Rose
Editor:
You may have some facts in the article, "What Can Bush Do?"
but you don’t seem to have much enthusiasm about the president
and rubbed me the wrong way. Donald W. Bales
Editor:
I am going to vote for Bush but there really are two lousy candidates
as far as limiting government is concerned. Never fall in love with
your candidate. Tim Sullivan
Editor:
Since the Republicans have decided to not to emphasize the Big Four:
Life, Guns, Immigration, and Family, in the Republican platform
or the convention, we can look for a lot of people to not vote for
president. This could cost Bush the election. Why are they doing
this? Melanie
Editor:
George Bush's campaign attacks reveal that (like his opponent) he
has no vision. Also, the campaign to date reveals that his administration
is adrift with no strategic objectives for the US economy, or the
US role in the world. This stands in stark contrast to the Reagan
Administration, which was guided by strong vision and grand strategy.
The Bush campaign (to date) is too much like that of John Kerry;
no leadership skills in evidence, and widespread distrust of the
candidate (the recent elevated terror alert was dismissed by a majority
of Americans as a political stunt). Bush has already lost the war
on terror, despite his bureaucratic budget battle victories) Because
he has positioned himself as another implementer of 'big government',
and 'beltway banditry', George W. Bush has blurred any significant
distinctions between himself and John Kerry. His re-election is
terefore in considerable doubt. Brian Lynch
Editor:
Regarding "Kerry Speech A Bust?" not only was the sweating
annoying, the first thing I said when I sawhim on TV (actually the
second thing, but the first thing is not printable) was "Does
he have ants in his pants or what?" My wife and friend who
were watching with me just laughed and accused me of being a partisan
Republican, but the fact was that he was bouncing from foot to foot
all through the speech (and not just shifting his weight; he looked
like those poor baby ducks in the Marshall Fields display in Chicago
where they put them on electrified plates and shocked them so they
would keep moving around). The fact that Sharpton was one of the
top speakers should be an embarrassment to the Democratic Party.
Here's a man who should have been ridden out of town on a rail ages
ago, and now he has managed to connive his way into legitimacy with
the national Democrats. Incredible. Nick Andrelli
Editor:
If John Kerry wishes to criticize or condemn the Swift Boat Vets,
that is his right. Obviously, any person should be afforded the
opportunity to answer and retort charges of the nature being made
against Kerry. However, instead of refuting the charges made by
over 200 Vietnam veterans who served with Kerry, including his entire
chain of command, Kerry is trying to silence them. That is honestly
scary. Is this what we can expect from a John Kerry Presidency?
Does John Kerry consider himself above any other laws that we should
know about? Hopefully, we will not have to find out. I do not know
if the Swift Boat Vets are telling the truth. I do not know if their
stated motivations and beliefs are genuine. But one thing I do know
is that they have a right to say it. Justin Darr
Editor:
Here is a new approach to deflate Kerry's "Lyin' Bubble Attack".
Congratulate him for his service and then ask him " What have
you done for this country since Viet Nam?" Let's start with
what you did with the medals you earned and the 'War Crimes' that
you confessed to before Congress, not to mention your utter disregard
for your fellow GI's still behind in the war zone. Then we can discuss
your years in the US Senate and all the weapon systems that you
voted against and now you want to better arm them--let us just hear
an answer.This is not a smear campaign, it is asking you to tell
the truth by answering for your public actions documented in the
Senate and Congressional records. This I feel would be a good positive
approach to use and would make Kerry and his media types dig for
a response that would justify his abject disdain for his fellow
citizens. Gary Brubaker, Hollywood, FL
Editor:
I love President Bush. He needs to get Senator McCain to tout his
accomplishments. He needs Senator Dole to speak out more often and
bring out why Kerry never thought it was important that Clinton
wasn’t in the military. People didn’t think Dole's obvious
injuries were a reason to vote for him; also, President Bush was
already elected as a result of or in spite of his Military record.
Why is Kerry afraid to speak about the last twenty years? Cami Lampert,
Brookline, Mass.
Editor:
It's very important for the GOP to tell exactly what the Dems are
planning, i.e., abolish all recent tax cuts, increase all levels
of income tax including tax on Social Security. Also, to reduce
defense and national security funding. Reduce the military, to allow
the U.N. to use and influence our courts and to rule as to when
and where to deploy American troops and ships. They also plan to
reduce the First and Second Amendments to the Constitution. In fact
the GOP must make all Americans aware of their socialist plans.
James C. Gravis, Houston, TX.
Editor:
To What Bush Must Do To Win and ABC's of a Successful GOP Convention,
please add "U.S. Constitution, Art IV, Sec. 4." Government
must defend us against invasion by others. Jay Burchett
Editor:
The Issue that more than 80% of Americans will vote for is the cessation
of ILLEGAL immigration and the horrendous costs borne by the States
for this insanity and threat to our Sovereignty. Mrs. Deibler
Editor:
Recently, I came across one of the most ridiculously radical liberal
websites that I have ever seen. What's more, the link that I found
which led to this website was located as an advertising banner on
the extremely popular Internet Movie Database (http://www.imdb.com/).
The extremist-liberal website is http://www.retrovsmetro.org/
It consistently attacks religion and basic American values. The
Internet Movie Database should be condemned for its partisan advertising
when it is publicly a non-political company that exists strictly
to focus on film. Nicholas Gausling
Email
the Editor
|