|
Reader
Comments
Editor:
Thank you for you and all the work you do to keep us properly informed.
I am grateful for the " strength to carry on " truths
that are presented by ACU to keep us going. This is my first time
on your website and I already copied several of your reports to
gain more insights that will better help me to pass on and hopefully
inspire others to stay on the lighted path. It only takes one candle
to light up a whole room, and you represent many! Best Life and
Stars and Stripes Forever
Susan Ralston -- Laguna Beach , California
Editor:
I'm impressed with your work. I do wish the politicians would stop
attaching non essential pork to major bills that can't be vetoed.
There has to be a way to stop them from doing that as it is adding
to the deficit in ways that is not necessary. Best, Dorothy
Editor:
Another fine issue and great photos. JC
Editor:
Good stuff, once again. CJ
Editor:
I hope you guys at the ACU will put together a letter for legislative
action regarding the democrats attempt to
remove the Rush Limbaugh show from the American armed forces radio
network.
Brian
Editor:
I have a grandnephew in Iraq I am very concerned about the way things
are going there, but I do not think that we can afford to lose there.
I'm concerned if the American people have the 'guts' to stick out
this war on terror, probably not until we have an atomic bomb in
our own country, or something else as bad. We are at a very difficult
time. The President needs much wisdom. Marie R. Larsen- a world
war II vet.
Editor:
Only Congress can set the rules for capture and punishment for those
who commit crimes against the law of nations. Folks keep telling
me they have no problem with the executive branch handling that.
As I keep pointing out Article 1 section 8 gives Congress not the
executive the power to make rules for capture and punishment against
those who commit crimes against the law of nations; which covers
Iraq and Afghanistan as Congress gave the President the power to
use force against these criminals but did not declare war.
Congress for too long has given the executive branch too much leeway
to the point where Congress no longer realizes when they are giving
away those powers which the Constitution gives to the legislative
branch. Anything your organization can do to force Congress to realize
and accept its responsibilities in this matter would be appreciated.
Respectfully, Tim Sullivan
Editor:
Your piece on Michael, No Moore is already somewhat dated as this
piece of garbage is scheduled to open nationwide late June. Mike
Burke
Editor:
Wasting Billions on the Green Agenda by Alan Caruba is interesting
about the forgiveness of debt being used to save the rainforest.
I can see how it would be negative to the Peruvian loggers at first
while they lose their jobs. I support reducing the rainforest destruction
but also would like to support human welfare at the same time. There
are people in the forest that lose their homes when their trees
are chopped. I don't know this is the case in Peru per se but I
do know that that is what is happening in the Chiapas rainforest
of Mexico. My argument is that regulation is not the answer but
neither is rampant logging. The compromise I can see would be from
the encouragement of rather taking things from the forest other
than the wood, compared to the medicinal potential that is so variegated.
This would slow the clear cut.
In
the Real Problem with the Tax System by Andy Obermann, he says that
a family of four earning 100grand would pay near 30% in fed taxes.
My 2003 tax table says that after adjusting gross income the tax
comes to just over 20grand, which is a big difference considering
the deductions and exemptions that mean it's much less than 20%
of the $100,000. He makes a good case for reducing government but
I think it is important to be accurate. He must have overlooked
that the 33% tax rate is for all income over and above the 28% which
is also whatever exceeds the 10% rate.
Andrew
Editor:
I would not trust the UN to do anything for me. It sounds to me
that this group wishes to rule the entire world, and have the US
carry the financial burden. We must remain strong and if necessary
stand alone. I praise the British for standing with us. Our President
has done his best to free other people, and let them enjoy the liberty
we in the United States enjoy. Sincerely, Elva Fuls-Richie
Editor: ON trusting the U.N. on Iraq, I just have
one thought on this subject. Did we not just trust the U.N. with
the Iraqi oil program? Are we crazy to trust them again---I think
so---Edna Manuel--Elmwood IL.
Email
the Editor
|