| Can't
trust U.N. to run Iraq
by David Keene
In
Sen. John Kerry's world, where one can have everything both ways,
the way to solve the Iraq "problem" is simple enough:
turn it over to the United Nations. If the Massachusetts Democrat
is serious, he is either naive or a true cynic. 
We
are learning much from Iraq. We have learned, for example, that
the United Nations is as corrupt and incompetent an institution
as any yet devised by the mind of man.
We
are told that President Bush wants to avoid his father's mistakes
in Iraq, so it's worth taking a moment to consider one real whopper.
After the first Bush administration drove Saddam Hussein's army
out of Kuwait, the decision was made to leave Saddam in power but
saddle him with strict sanctions to prevent him from his mad pursuit
of what we now so cavalierly refer to as "weapons of mass destruction."
People
still argue about whether we should have finished what we started
back then, but regardless, we should never have turned the administration
of the sanctions over to the United Nations. By doing so, we encouraged
rather than deterred Saddam and put him in a position to buy off
the United Nations itself and to influence the policies of several
countries that would later oppose any action against him and his
regime.
The
mechanism through which Saddam was able to accomplish all this was
the so-called "Oil-for-Food" program established after
the Gulf War, so that the Iraqi people would have access to food
and medical supplies despite the sanctions. Under the program, Iraq
was allowed to sell some of her oil through and with U.N. oversight,
with the proceeds going to purchase food and medicine for her people.
The
scheme grew into the largest "humanitarian" effort ever
run by the United Nations, generating something like $67 billion
in revenue between 1997 and 2002.
At one point it was estimated than perhaps 60 percent of Iraq's
24 million people depended on the program for their next meal, and
the United Nations touted it as a great success.
It
turns out that it was a great success all right, but not at providing
bread, medicine and bandages to the people of Iraq.
The
program's U.N. overseers allowed Saddam to divert as much as $10
billion of the money generated to help his people to private accounts
used in large part to buy "friends" in the West. He did
that with the overt cooperation of high-placed U.N. officials whom
he simply put on his payroll.
There
had been rumors even before we invaded Iraq that things weren't
all that they seemed, but it wasn't until U.S. troops arrived in
Baghdad that documentary evidence of a scandal bigger than anything
we have yet come to associate with either Iraq or the United Nations
began to come to light.
The
Iraq Oil Ministry recently released a partial list of people and
groups who'd been paid off by the Iraqi dictator. There were 270
names on the list, including that of a former French Cabinet minister,
a British member of parliament who had been a vocal critic of that
nation's decision to back the United States in Iraq, and U.N. Assistant
Secretary-General Benon Sevan, the man who actually ran the program.
To
top it all off, the list also includes a company with which Secretary-General
Kofi Annan's son has long been associated.
It
turns out that these men and hundreds of others received millions
of dollars in payoffs either to look the other way or to do Saddam's
bidding. Most of those on the list were either French or Russian,
and many were in influential positions in both countries -- countries
that opposed us doing anything about Saddam.
The
whole thing is now being investigated by the United States and by
the United Nations itself, but the United Nations has officially
warned anyone who may know anything about those payoffs or who might
cooperate with any investigation to shut up.
Kerry
may not know all that, since he hasn't really spent much time in
the Senate this year, but both Houses of Congress are investigating.
In fact, after looking at the evidence recently, his colleague Sen.
Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) said that "if the United Nations cannot
be trusted to run a humanitarian program, its other activities,
including peacekeeping... may be called into question."
This
is the body Kerry would have the United States turn to for help
in Iraq.
David Keene is chairman of the American Conservative Union and
a Washington-based government affairs consultant.
|