Is
Support for KKK "Right at Any Time"?
by
Andy Obermann
Somehow,
one major story has been completely overlooked by the Dan Rather
types in America's newsrooms. That is the story of Sen. Christopher
Dodd's (D-CT) praise of a former Ku Klux Klan member. 
Many
may remember the scrutiny Sen. Trent Lott received a couple of years
ago. For those in need of refreshing: In December of 2002, Lott,
then the majority leader in the Senate, made a short statement at
a celebration of Sen. Strom Thurmond's 100th birthday. Lott, apparently
caught up in the moment, claimed that the nation would have been
better off had Thurmond been elected president in 1948. "I
want to say this about my state," Lott rallied, "when
Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud
of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we
wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either."
Big mistake.
You
see Thurmond, who following his failed presidential attempt served
an unprecedented eight terms in the Senate, ran as a segregationist
in 1948. His record on civil rights was as shadowy as Bill Clinton's
internship program. He and another senator (to be named later) led
the charge in filibustering the 1964 Civil Rights Act and threatened
to block African American students from public schools with citizen
police forces. He incited race riots with his words and was funded
with money from the KKK. In short, he wasn't a man to be praised
in such terms -- especially by the sitting majority leader of the
Senate.
Lott,
as you recall, received major criticism, from the media and from
both Democrats and Republicans. For a solid week, the "Lott-watch"
was on every television news station and was the topic of discussion
for op/ed pages across the country. He eventually stepped down as
majority leader and was replaced by Sen. Bill Frist of Tennessee.
Enter
Christopher Dodd.
In
a speech earlier this month commemorating the 17,00th vote of Sen.
Robert Byrd (D-WV), Dodd proudly claimed that, "Robert C. Byrd...
would have been right at any time [in our history]. He would have
been right at the founding of this country... he would have been
right during the great conflict of civil war in this nation. I cannot
think of a single moment in this nation's 220-plus year history
where he would not have been a valuable asset to this country."
Big
uh-oh, right? Well, one would think so. After all, Sen. Byrd is
a former Klansman. In fact, he was the official "Kleagle"
(one who recruits new members for the cause) of West Virginia. He
is said to have "retired" from the group in 1943, but
speeches in the 1950s and 1960s showed some residue. In his floor
statement during the 1964 filibuster of the Civil Rights Act (yes,
Byrd was the other leader) he said, "[I would never fight]
with a Negro by my side. Rather I should die a thousand times...
than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels,
a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds."
Now,
in all fairness, many claim that Byrd has reformed his sordid past.
It may be true that he has stopped referring to African Americans
as "race mongrels," but he has not stopped completely.
In an interview on Fox News in 2001, Byrd used the term "n****r"
to denote race relations in America at the time. "There are
white n****rs. I've seen a lot of n****rs in my time. I'm going
to use that word," the "reformed" senator claimed.
He
obviously sounds like the perfect politician to lead America through
the Civil Rights Era and Civil War -- as Sen. Dodd claims. Or does
he?
The
fact of the matter is if a Republican made statements such as Dodd's,
the media would go crazy. There would be an outcry for his resignation
and censure. Unlike Lott, Dodd even made his feelings known on the
floor of the Senate. At least Trent Lott had the decency to keep
his comments out of the US Congress.
During
the Lott controversy, Sen. Dodd set the standard that, "...if
a Democratic leader had made [Lott's] statements, we would have
to call for his stepping aside, without any question, whatsoever."
Dodd
should take his own advice and step aside from his leadership position.
Andy
Obermann is a 22-year-old senior at a small private college in Central
Missouri. He is majoring in both History and Secondary Education
at Missouri Valley College.
|