Irrational Health World
by John Goodman
Issue 109 - June 11, 2008

In a rational world, deductibles and copayments serve an economic purpose.  Where it is appropriate and desirable for patients to make choices (e.g., primary care, small-dollar services), out-of-pocket cost sharing allows patients to bear some or all of the costs and reap some or all of the benefits of the choices they make.  Where patient choice is not appropriate or desirable (e.g., on a hospital gurney, large-dollar services), we would not expect to see cost sharing.  At least these are the principles that govern other insurance markets.

Yet in the market for health insurance, those principles are increasingly being turned upside down.  In the small group market a typical plan covers primary care visits from the first dollar, but imposes high deductibles and copayments for inpatient hospital care.  And whereas tiered pricing for drugs once encouraged generics over more expensive brand names, today tiered pricing is being used to impose thousands of dollars of cost on patients who must take expensive drugs with no generic substitutes.  (See article here)

Welcome to the irrational world of health insurance, where normal market forces have been systematically suppressed and no one ever faces a real price for everything.  State and federal regulations have made it illegal to charge employees premiums that reflect their individual expected health care costs or to deny them employment for health reasons.  But in outlawing discrimination, politicians have not outlawed self interest.

The brutal reality: In today's market, employers and insurers have every incentive to attract the healthy and avoid the sick.  And since it's illegal to do that directly, many are doing it indirectly by choosing health plans that appeal to the healthy and repel the sick.  The implicit message for people with health problems imbedded in many health plans is: "We don't want you in the first place and should you enroll (by some mistake) we hope you will quickly go elsewhere."

Ironically, there is only one product in the insurance marketplace that by law must limit the out-of-pocket exposure of the chronically ill.  That product is Health Savings Accounts!!!

But haven't we been told over and over again that HSA plans are bad for the sick and only good for the healthy?  Yes.  The battle against the syllogism is unending.

John Goodman is President of the National Center for Policy Analysis


E-mail the Editor

© 2008 American Conservative Union Foundation 1007 Cameron Street, Alexandria, VA 22314 Tel: 703.836.8602